Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date
Msg-id 20051017170223.GC26773@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:20:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> > What other linkers do we need to support?
>
> All the non-GNU ones.
>
> (I'm already desperately unhappy about the thin representation of
> non-GNU toolchains in the build farm...)

Ok, so it's a matter of research and testing. HPUX for example don't
have a version map and doesn't have the strip options either, but
allows you to specify:

+hideallsymbols +e sym +e sym

You can dump them all into a file and pull it in with "-c filename"

I can see a list of supported platforms [1], but not a list of
supported compilers/linkers. If it's just a matter of reasearching the
command-line options that can be done fairly easily, if anyone's
interested...

Have a nice day,

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/supported-platforms.html
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace