Re: On "multi-master" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: On "multi-master"
Date
Msg-id 20051014170800.GB20107@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On "multi-master"  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 01:33:22AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> BTW, the reason why I myself stick with pgpool is there's no
> perfect or acceptable replication solution for PostgreSQL (please do
> not talk about RAC or MySQL Cluster. I hate them:-).

And that's part of why we're looking at it, too.  Slony-I has a
target, but it's not this one.

> and has truly high-avilabilty). Maybe Slony-II is one of the hope, but
> I have no idea how the performance is...

Well, since it doesn't exist except in prototype yet, I think the
performance is pretty bad :-)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to.  That actually seems sort of quaint now.
        --J.D. Baldwin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase