Re: Time to start the PR machine - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Time to start the PR machine |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200509301731.j8UHVmT25317@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Time to start the PR machine ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Time to start the PR machine
Re: Time to start the PR machine |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
I think converted is the wrong word. Maybe "stored". --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joshua D. Drake wrote: > ---- > Bitmap Scan: some indexes will be automatically converted to > bitmaps in memory, giving up to 20x faster index performance on > complex queries against against very large tables, such as those > found in data marts. Bitmap Scan also greatly reduces the need > for multi-column indexes. > > Bitmap Scan: indexes will be automatically converted when appropriate... > > when needed > > ---- > > ---- > Shared Row Locking: PostgreSQL's "better than row-level > locking" has been improved further through the addition of > shared row locks for foreign keys. Shared locks will improve > insert and update performance on some OLTP applications > ^^^^ > > The word "some" sounds like it is a minority of OLTP applications. > In general any moderately used OLTP app will benifit from this yes? > > many, most, or just say performance on OLTP applications. > > --- > > > > Josh Berkus wrote: > > Javier, Josh, Mitch, etc.: > > > >> How about instead looking at this issue by trying to define a short > >> statement about postgres which should be included in every release, > > > > > > You know, all of your feedback would be *much* more useful if you > > actually read the release I have up, currently. I'll repeat, because > > nobody on *this* thread has once referred to this fact: > > > > The "ABOUT POSTGRESQL" statement contains a mention of the BSD license > > and its business-friendliness. > > > > Now, all of you, please read the release and make comments on what's > > actually there, thanks. > > > > http://pgfoundry.org/docman/view.php/1000047/85/release.txt > > > > The question is not whether we need to mention our license. That's > > already there. It's whether it needs more emphasis than it's already > > getting, like the phrase "released under the flexible BSD license" in > > the first paragraph. > > > > --Josh > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > > -- > Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
pgsql-advocacy by date: