Re: [GENERAL] Index use in BETWEEN statement... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

mydb=# explain analyze select locid from geoip_block where
'216.230.158.50'::inet between start_block and end_block;
                                                      QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on geoip_block  (cost=0.00..78033.96 rows=230141 width=8) (actual
time=13015.538..13508.708 rows=1 loops=1)
   Filter: (('216.230.158.50'::inet >= start_block) AND
('216.230.158.50'::inet <= end_block))
 Total runtime: 13508.905 ms
(3 rows)

mydb=# alter table geoip_block add constraint pkey_geoip_block primary key
(start_block, end_block);
NOTICE:  ALTER TABLE / ADD PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
"pkey_geoip_block" for table "geoip_block"
ALTER TABLE

mydb=# vacuum analyze geoip_block;

mydb=# explain analyze select locid from geoip_block where
'216.230.158.50'::inet between start_block and end_block;
                                                      QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on geoip_block  (cost=0.00..101121.01 rows=308324 width=8) (actual
time=12128.190..12631.550 rows=1 loops=1)
   Filter: (('216.230.158.50'::inet >= start_block) AND
('216.230.158.50'::inet <= end_block))
 Total runtime: 12631.679 ms
(3 rows)

mydb=#


As you see it still using a sequential scan in the table and ignores the
index, any other suggestion?

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Sean Davis
Sent: Lunes, 26 de Septiembre de 2005 10:24 a.m.
To: Cristian Prieto; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Index use in BETWEEN statement...

On 9/26/05 11:26 AM, "Cristian Prieto" <cristian@clickdiario.com> wrote:

>
> Hello pals, I have the following table in Postgresql 8.0.1
>
> Mydb# \d geoip_block
> Table "public.geoip_block"
>  Column    |  Type  | Modifiers
> -------------+--------+-----------
> locid       | bigint |
> start_block | inet   |
> end_block   | inet   |
>
> mydb# explain analyze select locid from geoip_block where
> '216.230.158.50'::inet between start_block and end_block;
>                                                     QUERY PLAN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on geoip_block  (cost=0.00..142772.86 rows=709688 width=8)
(actual
> time=14045.384..14706.927 rows=1 loops=1)
>  Filter: (('216.230.158.50'::inet >= start_block) AND
> ('216.230.158.50'::inet <= end_block))
> Total runtime: 14707.038 ms
>
> Ok, now I decided to create a index to "speed" a little the query
>
> Mydb# create index idx_ipblocks on geoip_block(start_block, end_block);
> CREATE INDEX
>
> clickad=# explain analyze select locid from geoip_block where
> '216.230.158.50'::inet between start_block and end_block;
>                                                     QUERY PLAN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on geoip_block  (cost=0.00..78033.96 rows=230141 width=8) (actual
> time=12107.919..12610.199 rows=1 loops=1)
>  Filter: (('216.230.158.50'::inet >= start_block) AND
> ('216.230.158.50'::inet <= end_block))
> Total runtime: 12610.329 ms
> (3 rows)
>
> I guess the planner is doing a sequential scan in the table, why not use
the
> compound index? Do you have any idea in how to speed up this query?

Did you vacuum analyze the table after creating the index?

Sean


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq