Re: table size performace - Mailing list pgsql-general

From A. Kretschmer
Subject Re: table size performace
Date
Msg-id 20050907093049.GG18174@webserv.wug-glas.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to table size performace  (Matthew Peter <survivedsushi@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
am  07.09.2005, um  1:01:11 -0700 mailte Matthew Peter folgendes:
> How many rows does it take for select performance on a
> table to degrade? I hope this question isn't to
> ambiguous (ie lollipop licks). But seriously, 100,000?
> 1,000,000? 10,000,000? With just a regular lookup on
> an unique index. Nothing crazy or aggregate.
>
> EX: select * from bigtable where id = 123456789

Read http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#4.4.

If you have a index, a simple select like your example is very fast,
independent of the rows count.


Regards.
--
Andreas Kretschmer    (Kontakt: siehe Header)
Heynitz:  035242/47212,      D1: 0160/7141639
GnuPG-ID 0x3FFF606C http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
 ===    Schollglas Unternehmensgruppe    ===

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Peter
Date:
Subject: table size performace
Next
From: "nicolas hafner"
Date:
Subject: 64 bits?