Re: Weird performance drop after VACUUM - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Steinar H. Gunderson
Subject Re: Weird performance drop after VACUUM
Date
Msg-id 20050827152603.GF17097@uio.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Weird performance drop after VACUUM  (Ümit Öztosun <umit@likyabilisim.com>)
Responses Re: Weird performance drop after VACUUM  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:05:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It could, but it doesn't really have enough information.  We don't
> currently have any model that some operators are more expensive than
> others.  IIRC the only sort of reordering the current code will do
> in a filter condition list is to push clauses involving sub-SELECTs
> to the end.

I was more thinking along the lines of reordering "a AND/OR b" to "b AND/OR
a" if b has lower selectivity than a.

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Inefficient queryplan for query with
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird performance drop after VACUUM