On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> If you've got any AFTER UPDATE triggers on that table, you could be
>>> running out of memory for the pending-triggers list.
>
>> Nope, only have a BEFORE UPDATE, or would that be similar except for at
>> which point it runs out of memory?
>
> Nope, BEFORE UPDATE shouldn't result in any permanent memory
> accumulation.
>
> An out-of-memory error should result in a long report in the postmaster
> log about how many bytes in each memory context --- can you post that?
This is all I'm seeing in the logs:
# grep "\[653\]" pgsql
Aug 11 08:45:47 pgsql80 pg[653]: [34-1] ERROR: out of memory
Aug 11 08:45:47 pgsql80 pg[653]: [34-2] DETAIL: Failed on request of size 32.
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
