Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ?
Date
Msg-id 20050610125305.Y90456@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Yeah it is an ordering problem with pg_dump...
>
> If you are using pg_restore you can hack around the problem by using
> pg_restore's load-order-control switch (which was invented exactly to
> let people work around pg_dump's problems ;-)).  In this case though,
> the simplest answer is probably to install tsearch2 into the new
> database before you run pg_restore.  It'll complain that the functions
> already exist, but you can ignore that.

More then just that ... it errors out trying to create tables that already 
exist from loading tsearch2.sql:

pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR:  relation "pg_ts_dict" already exists

So that doesn't appear to be an option either ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Concrete proposal for large objects and MVCC
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposed TODO: non-locking CREATE INDEX / REINDEX