On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:49, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hrmmmm ... I can see the argument for ... and without knowing what the
>>> conference area layout looks like, will the booths be at 'opposite ends'
>>> of the conference floor? If they are just going to be next to each
>>> other, then it seems redundant ... if you are looking at one at each
>>> 'end' (I realize that there is not necessarily an "end" per se), then
>>> two would make sense ...
>>
>> One will be in the .Org pavilion, one will be in the Commercial
>> Pavilion. I don't know how close they will be but they will not be next
>> to each other.
>>
>
> One issue that comes to mind is that we tend to make noise about being a
> community organization rather than just a piece of a specific corporate
> organization (like most of the other OS DB's)... would it not be odd if
> we had *no* presence in the community Pavilion? Might it confuse people
> who go looking in the community section for us and can't find any
> presence for postgresql?
Consider that we 'get nothing but a booth', I'd accept the booth and put
nothing in it by a sign pointing to the man'd booth :)
Personally, we shoudl accept the .Org booth regardless of whether the
Commercial one is setup ... if we *don't*, the offer may not be made next
year, since we obviously didn't need it ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
