Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Date
Msg-id 1118168337.26027.2585.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:49, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > Hrmmmm ... I can see the argument for ... and without knowing what the
> > conference area layout looks like, will the booths be at 'opposite ends'
> > of the conference floor?  If they are just going to be next to each
> > other, then it seems redundant ... if you are looking at one at each
> > 'end' (I realize that there is not necessarily an "end" per se), then
> > two would make sense ...
>
> One will be in the .Org pavilion, one will be in the Commercial
> Pavilion. I don't know how close they will be but they will not be next
> to each other.
>

One issue that comes to mind is that we tend to make noise about being a
community organization rather than just a piece of a specific corporate
organization (like most of the other OS DB's)... would it not be odd if
we had *no* presence in the community Pavilion?  Might it confuse people
who go looking in the community section for us and can't find any
presence for postgresql?


Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?