Hi Bruce,
>
> I think we are best with just pg_startime. If people want the
> interval
> they can subtract it from CURRENT_TIMESTAMP. I have added Matthias's
> version to the patch queue.
>
>
OK. But IIRC the Matthias implementation doesn't work in standalone
mode. And talking about the 'interval', I think it's too ugly make
this:
select CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - pg_starttime();
Isn't it more simple do this?
select pg_uptime();
I think few people will use start_time and more people will use uptime
that's why I propose the 'uptime' function.
Talking abouts names, IMHO we need to go with uptime() and
start_time(). Why? That's because a system function and it's about
server. When we implement backend uptime, we can go with
connection_uptime() and connection_start_time().
Comments?
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler[at]yahoo_com_br
__________________________________________________
Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/
