Re: pg_starttime() - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_starttime()
Date
Msg-id 200506061644.j56GiNe25892@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_starttime()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_starttime()
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >> I'd also propose to name this function pg_postmaster_starttime() to
> >> clarify its purpose.
>
> > Agreed, or pg_server_start_time()?  Which is better?
>
> It's not instantly obvious whether "server" means the postmaster or the
> current backend process, so I'd vote with Andreas on this.  But I also
> like start_time better than starttime ...

Yea, I agree on both.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_starttime()
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: uptime function to postmaster