Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT/ GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT/ GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT
Date
Msg-id 200505302030.j4UKUPV25987@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT/ GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT  (MLikharev@micropat.com)
Responses Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT/ GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT
List pgsql-general
Can someone in the community comment on this question?  I don't know the
answer.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

MLikharev@micropat.com wrote:
> Hi, I was asking this question some time ago and was under impression
> that this will be fixed in 8.x. In general problem is, CREATE TEMP
> TABLE AS SELECT does not report any rows to the engine, seems like, so
> GET DIAGNOSTICS ROW_COUNT after the statement returns 0 as well as
> FOUND false. This was working in 7.3, but behavior changed in 7.4.  My
> question is, will it be fixed or should I consider not stop using get
> diagnostic after ?create temp table as select? from now on. Honstly
> this was a very convinient feature especialy knowing that select
> count(*)  not a fastes possible operation.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>  subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with void integer
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: numeric precision when raising one numeric to