Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I was suggesting ESCAPE 'string' or ESC 'string'. The marker has to
> > be before the string so scan.l can alter its processing of the string
> > --- after the string is too late --- there is no way to undo any
> > escaping that has happened, and it might already be used by gram.y.
>
> That pretty much corresponds to my E'string' proposal. Both are
> probably equally trivial to implement.
Right. I think your E'' idea has the benefit of fitting with our
existing X'' and B'' modifiers. It is also simpler and cleaner to do in
scan.l, so I think your idea is best.
> > I agree with Tom that COPY has to be left unchanged. The fundamental
> > problem is the representation of NULL values, that I don't think we
> > can do without some escape mechanism. Single-quote escapes works by
> > doubling them, but once you need to represent something more like
> > null's, I can't think of a solution without escapes.
>
> Yes, I now realize that COPY has a whole set of different rules anyway,
> so we can leave that out of this discussion.
Cool.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
