Re: Select performance vs. mssql - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Date
Msg-id 200505241635.14558.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Select performance vs. mssql  (mark durrant <markd89@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Select performance vs. mssql  (PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>)
Re: Select performance vs. mssql  (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Folks,

> > This gets brought up a lot. The problem is that the
> > index doesn't include
> > information about whether the current transaction
> > can see the referenced
> > row. Putting this information in the index will add
> > significant overhead
> > to every update and the opinion of the developers is
> > that this would be
> > a net loss overall.

Pretty much.  There has been discussion about allowing index-only access to
"frozen" tables, i.e. archive partitions.  But it all sort of hinges on
someone implementing it and testing ....

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Next
From: PFC
Date:
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql