People,
> Can someone whose math is more recent than calculus in 1989 take a look at
> that paper, and look at the formula toward the bottom of page 10, and see
> if we are correctly interpreting it? I'm particularly confused as to
> what "q" and "d-sub-n" represent. Thanks!
Actually, I managed to solve for these and it appears we are using the formula
correctly. It's just a bad formula.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
