Re: Baffling sequential scan plan when index scan would - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: Baffling sequential scan plan when index scan would
Date
Msg-id 20050420180531.U78224@megazone.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Baffling sequential scan plan when index scan would be best  ("Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:

> I always thought I would not be the kind of person who writes to this
> list asking why the planner is using a sequential scan.  I always looked
> upon such people as newcomers who would eventually learn the mysterious
> wonders of the Pg query execution planner.
>
> But really, this plan is bizarre!  Why is it scanning sequentially for
> ONE tuple as selected by the primary key?  I even increased stats to
> 1000 and disable seq_scan, but it still insists it cannot do an index
> scan.

What version are you using?  If it's not 8.0.x, I'd guess this is the old
cannot use indexes from cross-integer type comparisons issue, and you may
want to explicitly cast or quote that 2143888.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jeffrey W. Baker"
Date:
Subject: Baffling sequential scan plan when index scan would be best
Next
From: Andreas Seltenreich
Date:
Subject: Re: Encoding problem