Re: inet increment w/ int8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: inet increment w/ int8
Date
Msg-id 20050420151810.GA512@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: inet increment w/ int8  ("Ilya A. Kovalenko" <shadow@oganer.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:30:08 +0800, "Ilya A. Kovalenko" <shadow@oganer.net> wrote:
> GS> I see a use case for of generating addresses based on a sequence or some
> GS> primary key from the database.
> 
> GS> Something like
> 
> GS> CREATE SEQUENCE hosts_ip_seq MAXVALUE 65536;
> GS> ALTER TABLE hosts ALTER ip SET DEFAULT '10.0.0.0/16'::inet + nextval(hosts_ip_seq')
> 
> hmm, not quite good idea - SEQUENCEs, by design, does not rollback next
> value on transation rollback, so you'll have holes on address range when
> other values will break some constraints or concurrent sessions
> appears.

You are going to have to have some way of handling holes anyway. What
happens when an allocated IP address is returned? That is why I think
for most uses a table with a row for each possible allocation is the
way to go.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 presentation
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: HAVING ...