Re: Interactive docs idea

From: Alvaro Herrera
Subject: Re: Interactive docs idea
Date: ,
Msg-id: 20050414180938.GB28198@dcc.uchile.cl
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Interactive docs idea  (Greg Stark)
Responses: Re: Interactive docs idea  (Greg Stark)
List: pgsql-hackers

Tree view

Interactive docs idea  (Christopher Kings-Lynne, )
 Re: Interactive docs idea  (Alvaro Herrera, )
  Re: Interactive docs idea  (Greg Stark, )
   Re: Interactive docs idea  (Christopher Kings-Lynne, )
    Re: Interactive docs idea  (Andrew Dunstan, )
 Re: Interactive docs idea  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Interactive docs idea  (Robert Treat, )
   Re: Interactive docs idea  (Alvaro Herrera, )
  Re: Interactive docs idea  (Greg Stark, )
   Re: Interactive docs idea  (Alvaro Herrera, )
    Re: Interactive docs idea  (Greg Stark, )
     Re: Interactive docs idea  (Alvaro Herrera, )
      Re: Interactive docs idea  (Greg Stark, )
   Re: Interactive docs idea  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
 Re: Interactive docs idea  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Interactive docs idea  ("Jim C. Nasby", )

On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:39:11PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:

> I think the idea of moderating the comments is inherently flawed. You can
> either have the deliberate, planned documentation without the comments, or you
> can have the wild-west style comments system, but trying to have it both ways
> is impossible. It just leads to the current situation where the comments are
> moribund.

What do you mean, moribund?  What happens is that at each release Tom
gets the comments and integrate whatever of value into the main text
body.  The rest are deleted.

That's the way it should be IMHO.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"I dream about dreams about dreams", sang the nightingale
under the pale moon (Sandman)



pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD mac68k crashing on union regression test
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: OUT parameters in PL/Java