Re: psql vs perl prepared inserts - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: psql vs perl prepared inserts
Date
Msg-id 20050413143111.GA7225@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql vs perl prepared inserts  (Matt Van Mater <matt.vanmater@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:57:09 -0400,
  Matt Van Mater <matt.vanmater@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also, I forgot to mention earlier that I tried using transactions to
> speed things up, but since I expect to see certain inserts fail I
> would need to rework my code so the whole transaction doesn't fail if
> one insert goes bad.  This is somewhat contrary to the purpose of
> transactions so I'm not sure how to accomplish this.  I saw roughly a
> 20% speed improvement by turning autocommit off and only committing at
> the end of parsing each file.

You might get a small benefit using savepoints in version 8.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Matt Van Mater
Date:
Subject: Re: psql vs perl prepared inserts
Next
From: James Robinson
Date:
Subject: Re: Composite type versus Domain constraints.