Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?  (Tom Lane)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> The point here is really that we keep finding reasons to, if not
> flat-out change the interface to PLs, at least expand their
> responsibilities.  Not to push it too hard, but we still have only
> one PL with a validator procedure, which IIRC was your own addition
> to that API.  How come they don't all have validators?

Point taken.  The reason was, as explained the other day, that before 
the arrival of the "trigger" pseudotype it was not really possible to 
implement that in some cases.  But I plan to follow up on that now.

Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Subject: Re: invalidating cached plans
From: Thomas Hallgren
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?