Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Buttafuoco
Subject Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable
Date
Msg-id 20050326152945.M53228@contactbda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew,

I can set one up a dedicated windows XP system on monday.  I also have some w2k systems that can be used.Are there 
directions anywhere?

Jim


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:19:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable

> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> >  
> >
> >>Windows has ordering failures on the join and rules tests - Cygwin has a 
> >>failures on the stats test. See buildfarm for details.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >The ordering failures seem to be because the recent planner hacking has
> >taken us back to preferring merge joins for these tests, and Windows'
> >version of qsort has bizarre behavior for equal keys.
> >
> >I put an ORDER BY in the rules test.  For join, I'm inclined to think
> >that the best bet is to resurrect the join_1.out variant comparison
> >file that we had awhile ago.  Unfortunately, what's in the CVS archives
> >is out of date and can't be used directly.  Could you send me the actual
> >rules.out you get on Windows to use for a comparison file?
> >  
> >
> 
> join.out sent off list
> 
> >Dunno about the stats failure.  It looks like the stats collector just
> >isn't working on Cygwin, but AFAIR no one has touched that code lately.
> >  
> >
> 
> It's worked before, that's the strange thing. I'll check some more.
> 
> >Do these machines fail on HEAD too?  (There don't seem to be any active
> >Windows buildfarm machines for HEAD, which is surely ungood.  Won't
> >someone step up and put one into the regular rotation?)
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof (appropriate quotation for 
> Good friday). I will address HEAD in due course.
> 
> The buildfarm members for both of these are in reality my laptop, which 
> doesn't even run Windows all the time, and has lots of other duties 
> anyway. We (or rather Josh Berkus and Bruce, at my request) are looking 
> for a replacement.
> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
------- End of Original Message -------



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for collation using ICU