Qingqing Zhou wrote:
>
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes
> >
> > We already have the ability to issue custom messages in assign_hooks,
> > and I think that's sufficient in practice.
>
> Yes, I agree this is already sufficient - seems we need to remove that TODO
> item in the list.
Removed. I think we have all the conflicting options fixed already:
< o Prevent conflicting SET options from being set
<
< This requires a checking function to be called after the server
< configuration file is read.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073