Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Implementing this type of syntax checker isn't hard since the code
> > is already there, but there might be a small, ugly problem. IIRC,
> > the parser and/or semantic analyzer of PL/pgSQL relies on knowing
> > whether the function is called as a trigger. You don't know that
> > at creation phase.
>
> Looking for RETURNS TRIGGER seems like an adequate cue for that.
Indeed... So that used to be a problem, but it seems all obstacles are
now removed.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
