Re: unicode support vs native install - Mailing list pgsql-cygwin

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: unicode support vs native install
Date
Msg-id 200503130123.j2D1NjC04214@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to unicode support vs native install  ("Eric J. Schwarzenbach" <Eric.Schwarzenbach@wrycan.com>)
List pgsql-cygwin
Eric J. Schwarzenbach wrote:
> The Running & Installing PostgreSQL On Native Windows FAQ has an item on
> not being able to use unicode
>
> http://pginstaller.projects.postgresql.org/FAQ_windows.html#2.6
>
> "/Because Postgres relies on the operating system for some string
> related functions, the OS needs to support the same encoding as the one
> that is used as the database encoding. Unfortunately, Windows does not
> support some encodings that are available as server-side encodings for PG."
>
> /My understanding is the 8.0 windows installer prevents istalling utf-8
> but you can get around it with initdb if you know what your doing.
> Apparently only some things related to utf-8 data will be broken like
> sort ordering.
> /
> /Does this apply to Cygwin installs of PostgreSQL as well?

Yes, it does.  The problem is that we only support UTF8 and Windows is
UTF16.  If you don't care about character ordering you can initdb with
locale of C and use Unicode as your encoding.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-cygwin by date:

Previous
From: "Eric J. Schwarzenbach"
Date:
Subject: unicode support vs native install
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: unicode support vs native install