Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 2. M?rz 2005 16:50 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > Right. It is Unix that has the problem. It seems we are supplying a
> > special snprintf() only so gettext() in libintl will use ours instead of
> > the operating system's. Isn't there a way to target just that library
> > for our replacement snprintf()? Our code itself doesn't need the
> > positional parameters.
>
> No, it's exactly our code that needs the snprintf(). libintl does not need
> it.
OK, I figured that out later. gettext() gets the string, but we are the
ones to match the string to the args.
> > Could we read the snprintf translation string and process positional
> > parameters _before_ we sent it to gettext()?
>
> That would defeat the entire point of this exercise. Then translators would
> have to translate each possible substitution separately and we wouldn't need
> positional parameters at all.
Right.
Should we consider using a macro for snprintf/vsnprintf/printf in our
code and map those to pg_* names so we don't let those symbols out of
our code? The big problem is that client apps like psql need the
port/snprintf functions we have.
We actually have libpgport on the link line for clients so it is really
only libpq exporting it that is a problem. If we could prevent that we
would be fine.
I think we got away with replacing system functions in the past because
we were replacing either broken or missing functions. In this case,
snprintf has a variety of format flags, some OS-specific, and the
functionality we are adding is not critical in most applications.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
