Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I think this means it is finding our /port/snprintf(), but when it calls
> > vsnprintf, it must be using some other version, probably the operating
> > system version that doesn't support %lld.
I can confirm that using "%I64d" for the printf format allows the
regression tests to pass for int8.
> Ya know, I was wondering about that but dismissed it because the
> routines were all declared in the same file. Windows' linker must
> behave very oddly to do this.
Yep, quite unusual.
> Does it help if you flip the order of the snprintf and vsnprintf
> functions in snprintf.c?
Testing now.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
