Re: R?f. : Re: R?f. : Re: [PORTS] - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: R?f. : Re: R?f. : Re: [PORTS]
Date
Msg-id 200502021816.j12IGRl02047@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: [PORTS]  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-ports
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> frederic.germaneau@bull.net wrote:
> > I choose this naming to avoid corrupting any already installed older
> > version;
> > (i.e. my old postgresql 7 rpm create also a postgre7 user, and the 2
> > versions work at the same time on the same server (I just need to
> > change one postmaster port))
>
> If you distinguish between PostgreSQL 7 and PostgreSQL 8 then you have a
> grave misunderstanding about the PostgreSQL version numbering.  The
> major version numbers go ... 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 8.0, 8.1, ...  The change
> from 7 to 8 is purely arbitrary.  So to make sense you should create
> users postgre72, postgre73, postgre74, postgre80, etc., otherwise it's
> just random.

I wonder if we should define major/minor version numbers somewhere, like
in the FAQ?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: "Paulo Rogerio Zimolo"
Date:
Subject: DATA DIRECTORY IS MISSING
Next
From: "Adodo, Adewale"
Date:
Subject: Postgres install on windows 2003 server