Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1, postgresql 7.4.5 and shared memory settings - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1, postgresql 7.4.5 and shared memory settings
Date
Msg-id 20050130215029.GP64304@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1, postgresql 7.4.5 and shared memory settings  (Rick Apichairuk <rapichai@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 04:26:29PM -0500, Rick Apichairuk wrote:
> Is the shared_buffers per process? The reason I ask is the formula
> given on http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/kernel-resources.html
> for calculating how much SHMMAX you need is:
>
> SHMMAX = 250 kB + 8.2 kB * shared_buffers + 14.2 kB * max_connections
> up to infinity

No, it is system-wide. shared_buffers is used for a number of things,
but any excess is used by PostgreSQL to buffer data it reads. Before 8.0
the consensus was that (unlike most databases) it's better to let the OS
cache the data instead of PostgreSQL. 8.0 has a much more advanced cache
management algorithm, so it might now be better to let PostgreSQL be
your primary cache, but AFAIK no testing has been done to show that's
the case.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL worm attacks Windows servers
Next
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1, postgresql 7.4.5 and shared memory settings