Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables
Date
Msg-id 200501291351.10335.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Performance problem with semi-large tables  ("Ken Egervari" <ken@upfactor.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Ken,

Actually, your problem isn't that generic, and might be better solved by
dissecting an EXPLAIN ANALYZE.

> 1. Should I just change beg to change the requirements so that I can make
> more specific queries and more screens to access those?

This is always good.

> 2. Can you
> recommend ways so that postgres acts on big tables more efficiently?  I'm
> not really interested in this specific case (I just made it up).  I'm more
> interested in general solutions to this general problem of big table sizes
> with bad filters and where join orders don't seem to help much.

Well, you appear to be using ORDER BY ... LIMIT.   Is there a corresponding
index on the order by criteria?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Weimann
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Next
From: "David Parker"
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables