Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Date
Msg-id 200501241545.51737.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL  (Ragnar Hafstað <gnari@simnet.is>)
Responses Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
List pgsql-performance
Ragnar,

> note that these sometimes do not provide connection pooling as such,
> just persistent connections (Apache::DBI)

Yes, right.

> no. you can only count on web-server-process==connection, but not
> web-user==connection, unless you can garantee that the same user
> client always connects to same web-server process.

Are there ones that you use which might use several different connections to
send a series of queries from a single web-user, less than 5 seconds apart?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ragnar Hafstað
Date:
Subject: Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Next
From: Litao Wu
Date:
Subject: reltuples after vacuum and analyze