Re: OID Usage - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: OID Usage
Date
Msg-id 20050115211842.GQ67721@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OID Usage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: OID Usage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 04:00:19PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 07:10:48PM +0100, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
> >> Hmm, so a data row update also update the CTID in all indexes, too. I=20
> >> see what you mean !
>
> > Not quite, a single index entry needs to point to any number of rows,
> > which may or may not be visible depending on your transaction, so they
> > form a sort of linked list.
>
> No, an index entry contains just one CTID.  An update makes a new
> version of the row (stored at a new CTID location) and also makes new
> index entries pointing at that CTID.  In the general case this must be
> so, since the new version might well contain different values for the
> indexed fields; but we do not try to optimize the case where the indexed
> field didn't change.

Out of curiosity, what clears out the old index tuples? Vacuum?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Index optimization ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: OID Usage