On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:02:12AM +0100, PFC wrote:
>
> As a sidenote, I have a table with a primary key which is not a
> sequence, and this query displays the non-existing sequence name. It would
> be easy to check if the sequence exists (yet another join !), only display
> sequences that exist ;)...
Hmmm...that's odd, since the query gets the sequence name through
a series of inner joins that go back go pg_class -- if the sequence
doesn't exist then where is the name coming from? I did notice
that the query should add "AND attisdropped IS FALSE" to the join
with pg_attribute, but I don't see how that would affect this case.
Can you spot where the mistake is? What does "\d tablename" show
for the table in question?
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
