Re: Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karsten Hilbert
Subject Re: Large Objects
Date
Msg-id 20050102173824.C566@hermes.hilbert.loc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large Objects  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-general
> > >BYTEA is not always pragmatic. What is the file is 100 megs? 256 megs?

> > What is the size when bytea become inafective ?

> I don't think it's so much a matter of effectiveness, it makes no
> difference at all in storage space.
Ah, thanks, good to know. Something new to learn every day...

> The issue is that if you store it
> in a field, accessing it becomes an all or nothing affair, which means
> if it's a 100Mb object, it's all going to be accessed whenever you ask
> for it.
At least for reads you are wrong. You can use substring() on
bytea quite nicely. Remember, however, that that operates on
*bytes*, not characters. Also be careful about encodings being
set for the connection. At least with PostgreSQL < 7.4 we found
we had to "reset client_encoding" despite the docs saying
encodings won't affect bytea field reads.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kretschmer
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared Sequences?
Next
From: John Sidney-Woollett
Date:
Subject: Re: