Re: join selectivity - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From strk@refractions.net
Subject Re: join selectivity
Date
Msg-id 20041223154147.GC4535@freek.keybit.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: join selectivity  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:13:03AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> strk@refractions.net writes:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:01:33AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Right.  This amounts to assuming that the join conditions and the
> >> restriction conditions are independent, which of course is bogus,
> >> but we really don't have enough information to do better.
> 
> > Doesn't JOINSEL have access to RESTRICTSEL output for REL1 and REL2 ?
> 
> You could probably compare the fields of the RelOptInfo structures,
> but what are you going to do with it?  AFAICS you *should not* make
> the join selectivity depend on that.

So it should NOT depend on full number of rows either, is this right ?

--strk;

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: strk@refractions.net
Date:
Subject: Re: join selectivity
Next
From: strk@refractions.net
Date:
Subject: Re: join selectivity