Do the multiple actions within a multiple action rule implicitly reside
within a transaction? I notice that if I brace my multiple actions with
BEGIN; and COMMIT;, that I get a syntax error, so I'm assuming that's
because they are superfluous in that context... ?
(I want to be sure that I can count on 'currval' returning the sequence
value returned by the previous action's 'nextval', so that I know I am
inserting the proper foreign key into a table after inserting a record
into the referenced table.)
--
Ron Peterson
Network & Systems Manager
Mount Holyoke College
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso
