Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Darcy Buskermolen
Subject Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6
Date
Msg-id 200412031335.48822.darcy@wavefire.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6
List pgsql-hackers
On December 3, 2004 11:14 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com> writes:
> > On December 3, 2004 10:31 am, you wrote:
> >> 2. There are critical notices on buildfarm for some more popular
> >> platforms such as Solaris 9 and Open BSD.
> >
> > The OpenBSD error should be fixed by
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-
> >secure.c?f=h;rev=1.60
>
> Right, that was my silly oversight last night.
>
> > and other than that I see noting on the build far that is questionable
> > (other than the win32 regres test notice)
>
> It's too bad the buildfarm reports don't show more details about what
> CVS pull they're using exactly.  I think that this case might be fixed
> by the tweaking I did yesterday, but I can't tell whether that run
> occurred before or after that commit.  In any case it's not a real
> failure, just an output-ordering difference.

http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=loris&dt=2004-12-03%2020:54:53

Lends me to think your tweek didn't push hard enough in the right spots.

>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

-- 
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx:  250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
Next
From: schmidtm
Date:
Subject: somebody working on: Prevent default re-use of sysids for dropped users and groups?