Re: Update instead rules on Views - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Markus Schaber
Subject Re: Update instead rules on Views
Date
Msg-id 20041102164236.639f10c9@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update instead rules on Views  (Markus Schaber <schabios@logi-track.com>)
List pgsql-sql
Hello,

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:20:37 +0100
Markus Schaber <schabios@logi-track.com> wrote:

> > -- But to remain compatibility with old apps, we also need to manage
> > -- updates to the view, which are to be rewritten as follows:
> > CREATE RULE testview_update_rule
> > AS ON UPDATE TO testview DO INSTEAD
> >     UPDATE realdata SET
> >         index = NEW.index,
> >         data = NEW.data,
> >         obsolete=NULL
> >     ;
>
> I now got it to work with adding a "WHERE index=NEW.index" to the view.

This seems only to work when I update on the INDEX row. I now modified
the rule to look like:

CREATE RULE testview_update_rule
AS ON UPDATE TO testview DO INSTEAD    UPDATE realdata SET        index = NEW.index,       data = NEW.data,
obsolete=NULL  WHERE index = OLD.index; 

This seems to work now for arbitrary columns, provided that index is an
unique row.

When I have a table that looks like
index | data  | obsolete
-------+-------+----------    2 | test  |             3 | blubb |             1 | nono  |             3 | hallo |
  

and I issue  viewtest=# update testview set data='blob' where data='hallo';

I get: UPDATE 2

and it really updated 2 rows.

As far as I understand now, I need a primary key in the underyling table
as the qualification from the original statemet is applied to the view
results, and not propagated to the underlying table.

Thanks,
Markus

--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: "Arash Zaryoun"
Date:
Subject: Re: 'show databases' in psql way?
Next
From: Andrew Hammond
Date:
Subject: Re: JOIN not being calculated correctly