psql large RSS (1.6GB) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From TTK Ciar
Subject psql large RSS (1.6GB)
Date
Msg-id 20041027075748.GA8355@hardpoint.ciar.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB)  (Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>)
Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB)  (Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>)
List pgsql-performance
Hello!

  My name is TTK, and I'm a software engineer at the Internet Archive's
Data Repository department.  We have recently started using postgresql
for a couple of projects (we have historically been a MySQL outfit),
and today my co-worker noticed psql eating memory like mad when invoked
with a simple select statement incorporating a join of two tables.

  The platform is a heavily modified RedHat 7.3 Linux.  We are using
version 7.4.5 of postgresql.

  The invocation was via sh script:

#!/bin/bash

outfile=$1
if [ -z "$outfile" ]; then
    outfile=/0/brad/all_arcs.txt
fi

/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/psql -c 'select
ServerDisks.servername,ServerDisks.diskserial,ServerDisks.diskmountpoint,DiskFiles.name,DiskFiles.md5from
DiskFiles,ServerDiskswhere DiskFiles.diskserial=ServerDisks.diskserial;' -F ' ' -A -t -o $outfile 

.. and the tables in question are somewhat large (hundreds of GB's
of data), though we didn't expect that to be an issue as far as the
psql process was concerned.

  We monitored server load via 'top -i -d 0.5' and watched the output
file for data.  Over the course of about 200 seconds, psql's RSS
climbed to about 1.6 GB, and stayed there, while no data was written
to the output file.  Eventually 10133194 lines were written to the
output file, all at once, about 1.2GB's worth of data.

  I re-ran the select query using psql in interactive mode, and saw
the same results.

  I re-ran it again, using "explain analyse", and this time psql's
RSS did *not* increase significantly.  The result is here, if it
helps:

brad=# explain analyse select
ServerDisks.servername,ServerDisks.diskserial,ServerDisks.diskmountpoint,DiskFiles.name,DiskFiles.md5from
DiskFiles,ServerDiskswhere DiskFiles.diskserial=ServerDisks.diskserial; 
                          QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hash Join  (cost=22.50..65.00 rows=1000 width=274) (actual time=118.584..124653.729 rows=10133349 loops=1)
   Hash Cond: (("outer".diskserial)::text = ("inner".diskserial)::text)
   ->  Seq Scan on diskfiles  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=198) (actual time=7.201..31336.063 rows=10133349
loops=1)
   ->  Hash  (cost=20.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=158) (actual time=90.821..90.821 rows=0 loops=1)
         ->  Seq Scan on serverdisks  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=158) (actual time=9.985..87.364 rows=2280
loops=1)
 Total runtime: 130944.586 ms

  At a guess, it looks like the data set is being buffered in its
entirety by psql, before any data is written to the output file,
which is surprising.  I would have expected it to grab data as it
appeared on the socket from postmaster and write it to disk.  Is
there something we can do to stop psql from buffering results?
Does anyone know what's going on here?

  If the solution is to just write a little client that uses perl
DBI to fetch rows one at a time and write them out, that's doable,
but it would be nice if psql could be made to "just work" without
the monster RSS.

  I'd appreciate any feedback.  If you need any additional info,
please let me know and I will provide it.

  -- TTK
  ttk2@ciar.org
  ttk@archive.org


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Spraul
Date:
Subject: Re: futex results with dbt-3
Next
From: Dustin Sallings
Date:
Subject: Re: psql large RSS (1.6GB)