Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Abhijit Menon-Sen
Subject Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Date
Msg-id 20041015015018.GA5285@penne.toroid.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
List pgsql-hackers
(I apologise for the delayed response.)

At 2004-10-07 01:23:56 -0400, gsstark@mit.edu wrote:
>
> So why is this part of the patch ok? Isn't it going to make libpq get
> confused every time a PQExecPrepared sends a v3.0 prepare message?

I thought about that for a while, but I couldn't find anything that is
actually broken or confused by the patch. I could be missing something
obvious, though, so I'd appreciate another set of eyes looking at it.

Does anyone have any ideas?

-- ams


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: plans for bitmap indexes?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange code in initdb