Re: Press Release, Final Draft? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Press Release, Final Draft? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200409231010.05388.josh@agliodbs.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Press Release, Final Draft? ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Press Release, Final Draft?
Re: Press Release, Final Draft? Re: Press Release, Final Draft? Re: Press Release, Final Draft? Re: Press Release, Final Draft? |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Greg, Robert, Merlin, > "developers and software vendors" - um, what about users? When I think of > "developer", I think of the "developers" mentioned in the next paragraph: > e.g. pg hackers. Hmmm ... good point. What's meant there is "application developers", but I don't want to make the sentence any longer. "users" it is. > The second sentence introduces a large list before explaining what the real > noun of the sentence is ("companies") - perhaps "Many companies, including > ..." Hmmm. I can see that. > Simply "hundreds of developers" sounds better than "over 200 individual > developers" How do other people feel about this? I prefer the concrete number. > > Oh, and Peter, I need to list "SRA of Japan" because there is an SRA, > > Inc. in the US which is a different company. > > Do they have distinct legal names? Hmmm ... Software Research Associates, Inc., is the Japanese PostgreSQL-supporting company. I can't find SRA International Inc's name spelled out anywhere on their web site and they don't google on "Software Research Associates"; so maybe we just spell it out. > Do we have a list to back up our "more than a dozen other" claim? Not that I've assembled, but do you doubt it? Here's a sampling: Aglio Database Solutions, TDMSoft, creatediv, Cybertec.at, dbExperts, Peer Direct. > I dislike "lazy vacuum": 'lazy' has some very negative connotations, > irregardless of the technology it represents in this case. Call it an > "advanced vacuuming system" Sorry, that's the name of the feature. > It might be nice to sneak in a mention that we already have a whole slew of > languages that have been available for a long time already. I'd be happy to see you write something up for the extended version on the web site. The to-be-mailed version is pretty long already. > Perhaps "for a full description of all the new items in version 8.0, see > ..." I can see that. > BTW - On the web page we call it a licence. British vs. American spelling. > Like: "which provides royalty free distribution for com and non-com > use". I like this, a little tweaked: PostgreSQL is distributed under a BSD license, which allows fee-free use and distribution, for both commercial and non-commercial use. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
pgsql-advocacy by date: