Re: WIN1250 as server encoding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: WIN1250 as server encoding
Date
Msg-id 200409151828.06423.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIN1250 as server encoding  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAIR, the only place where these numbers are stored is in
> pg_database.datencoding, so only the server-encoding values are
> frozen in any meaningful sense.  You could rearrange the numbers
> currently assigned to client encodings to preserve the range
> property.

Interesting.  I guess I was too traumatized by the last numbering change 
to ignore that possibility.  Does anyone else see a problem with that?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: banner vs version
Next
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: some PITR performance data with DBT-2