Multiple Uniques - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Markus Schaber |
---|---|
Subject | Multiple Uniques |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20040902154340.5b1a669a@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Multiple Uniques
Re: Multiple Uniques |
List | pgsql-performance |
Hello, Today, we stumbled about the following query plan on PostGreSQL 7.4.1: logigis=# explain select count(id) from (select distinct id from (select distinct ref_in_id as id from streets union selectdistinct nref_in_id as id from streets) as blubb) as blabb; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=33246086.32..33246086.32 rows=1 width=8) -> Subquery Scan blabb (cost=32970061.50..33246085.82 rows=200 width=8) -> Unique (cost=32970061.50..33246083.82 rows=200 width=8) -> Sort (cost=32970061.50..33108072.66 rows=55204464 width=8) Sort Key: id -> Subquery Scan blubb (cost=23697404.79..24525471.75 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Unique (cost=23697404.79..23973427.11 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Sort (cost=23697404.79..23835415.95 rows=55204464 width=8) Sort Key: id -> Append (cost=7212374.04..15252815.03 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 1" (cost=7212374.04..7626407.52 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Unique (cost=7212374.04..7350385.20 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Sort (cost=7212374.04..7281379.62 rows=27602232 width=8) Sort Key: ref_in_id -> Seq Scan on streets (cost=0.00..3129090.32 rows=27602232width=8) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 2" (cost=7212374.04..7626407.52 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Unique (cost=7212374.04..7350385.20 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Sort (cost=7212374.04..7281379.62 rows=27602232 width=8) Sort Key: nref_in_id -> Seq Scan on streets (cost=0.00..3129090.32 rows=27602232width=8) (20 rows) I might have to add that this query is not an every-day query, it's merely part of some statistics that a colleague needs for some estimations as he has to create a tool that works on this data. Both ref_in_id and nref_in_id are non-indexed columns with type int8. I was somehow irritated by the fact that the Query Plan contains 4 Uniques. Then, I tried the following query: logigis=# explain select count(id) from (select distinct id from (select ref_in_id as id from streets union select nref_in_idas id from streets) as blubb) as blabb; QUERY PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=24803496.57..24803496.57 rows=1 width=8) -> Subquery Scan blabb (cost=24527471.75..24803496.07 rows=200 width=8) -> Unique (cost=24527471.75..24803494.07 rows=200 width=8) -> Sort (cost=24527471.75..24665482.91 rows=55204464 width=8) Sort Key: id -> Subquery Scan blubb (cost=15254815.03..16082881.99 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Unique (cost=15254815.03..15530837.35 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Sort (cost=15254815.03..15392826.19 rows=55204464 width=8) Sort Key: id -> Append (cost=0.00..6810225.28 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 1" (cost=0.00..3405112.64 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Seq Scan on streets (cost=0.00..3129090.32 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 2" (cost=0.00..3405112.64 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Seq Scan on streets (cost=0.00..3129090.32 rows=27602232 width=8) (14 rows) And after re-parsing the documentation about UNION, the following one: logigis=# explain select count(id) from (select ref_in_id as id from streets union select nref_in_id as id from streets)as blubb; QUERY PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=16220893.16..16220893.16 rows=1 width=8) -> Subquery Scan blubb (cost=15254815.03..16082881.99 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Unique (cost=15254815.03..15530837.35 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Sort (cost=15254815.03..15392826.19 rows=55204464 width=8) Sort Key: id -> Append (cost=0.00..6810225.28 rows=55204464 width=8) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 1" (cost=0.00..3405112.64 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Seq Scan on streets (cost=0.00..3129090.32 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Subquery Scan "*SELECT* 2" (cost=0.00..3405112.64 rows=27602232 width=8) -> Seq Scan on streets (cost=0.00..3129090.32 rows=27602232 width=8) (10 rows) Those queries should give the same result. So, now my question is, why does the query optimizer not recognize that it can throw away those "non-unique" Sort/Unique passes? Is PostGreSQL 8 capable of this optimization? Thanks, Markus -- markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
pgsql-performance by date: