Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime() - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Ed L.
Subject Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Date
Msg-id 200408271308.36954.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Friday August 27 2004 1:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> > On Friday August 27 2004 12:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> BTW, as long as we are taking Apache as the de facto standard --- does
> >> the default of "postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log" actually make sense,
> >> or would something different be closer to the common practice with
> >> Apache?
> >
> > I should say, Apache rotatelogs takes a configurable filename and then
> > appends ".N" where N is the logfile start time epoch.  In one case, its
> > access_log.N, in another its error_log.N.
>
> Hmm ... there isn't any way to emulate that with strftime escapes,
> unless I missed the right one.

If you supply an escape, Apache will override that default epoch.  So I
could see setting the default to "server_log" or "postgresql_log" or
whatever, and making the default (with no escapes supplied) be the epoch.
That would be easy tweak, and be much closer to Apache style.

Ed

Apache 1.3.31:

            if (use_strftime) {
                struct tm *tm_now;
                tm_now = gmtime(&tLogStart);
                strftime(buf2, sizeof(buf2), szLogRoot, tm_now);
            }
            else {
                sprintf(buf2, "%s.%010d", szLogRoot, (int) tLogStart);
            }


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()