Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime() - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Date
Msg-id 1652.1093633427@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
Responses Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-patches
"Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> On Friday August 27 2004 12:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, as long as we are taking Apache as the de facto standard --- does
>> the default of "postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log" actually make sense, or
>> would something different be closer to the common practice with Apache?

> I should say, Apache rotatelogs takes a configurable filename and then
> appends ".N" where N is the logfile start time epoch.  In one case, its
> access_log.N, in another its error_log.N.

Hmm ... there isn't any way to emulate that with strftime escapes,
unless I missed the right one.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Next
From: "Ed L."
Date:
Subject: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()