Peter Eisentraut wrote
> David Wheeler wrote:
> > That's not the trouble so much as that the locales can be badly
>
> If we always followed the principle "X could be broken, so let's not use
> X", then we would never get anything done. Instead, "X is broken, so
> fix it".
You want to talk my employer into giving me a month (full time) to build
some foundation open source tools, with the understanding that when
that's done maybe we'll know enough to actually be able to pin down a
schedule for fixing this one?
> > broken, and that they're useless for multilingual use.
>
> I don't agree with that, but perhaps we differ in our interpretation of
> "multilingual use".
Yes. There is a huge difference between incidental use of CJKV encodings
in a mostly Latin-based language database and using incidental Latin
characters in a mostly CJKV database.
> If you have special requirements, you can always
> turn the locales off.
Wish it were that simple, but that's where we apparently have to start,
for now.
--
Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
