Re: 8.0.0beta1: Ownership of implicit sequences after dump/restore - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: 8.0.0beta1: Ownership of implicit sequences after dump/restore |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200408180033.i7I0Xwj25570@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | 8.0.0beta1: Ownership of implicit sequences after dump/restore (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>) |
List | pgsql-bugs |
I have reproduced this problem in current CVS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Fuhr wrote: > PostgreSQL version: 8.0.0beta1 > Operating system : Solaris 9 > > Backups created by pg_dump/pg_dumpall don't set the ownership of > implicitly-created sequences. When backups are restored, users who > created sequences may not be able to use them. > > How to repeat: > > 1. Create a test user and a test database. > > createuser -P -Upostgres testuser > Enter password for new user: ******** > Enter it again: ******** > Shall the new user be allowed to create databases? (y/n) n > Shall the new user be allowed to create more new users? (y/n) n > > createdb -Upostgres testdb > > 2. Connect to the test database as the test user, create explicit > and implicit sequences, then list the sequences. > > psql -Utestuser testdb > CREATE SEQUENCE test_seq; > CREATE TABLE stuff (id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT NOT NULL); > \ds > List of relations > Schema | Name | Type | Owner > --------+--------------+----------+---------- > public | stuff_id_seq | sequence | testuser > public | test_seq | sequence | testuser > (2 rows) > > 3. Make a backup of the test database. > > pg_dump -Upostgres testdb > backup.sql > > 4. Drop the test database. > > dropdb -Upostgres testdb > > 5. Recreate the test database and restore it. > > createdb -Upostgres testdb > psql -Upostgres -f backup.sql testdb > > 6. Connect to the test database as the test user, show the sequences, > and try to use the implicitly-created one. > > psql -Utestuser testdb > \ds > List of relations > Schema | Name | Type | Owner > --------+--------------+----------+---------- > public | stuff_id_seq | sequence | postgres > public | test_seq | sequence | testuser > (2 rows) > > SELECT nextval('stuff_id_seq'); > ERROR: permission denied for sequence stuff_id_seq > > pg_dump sets the ownership of the explicitly-created sequence via > an ALTER TABLE statement (I see ALTER SEQUENCE ... OWNER TO on the > TODO list): > > ALTER TABLE public.test_seq OWNER TO testuser; > > No such statement is issued for the implicitly-created sequence, > resulting in the sequence being owned by the user who restored the > database. This would typically be a database superuser. > > Is this a bug in pg_dump/pg_dumpall, or is it a bug in the ALTER > TABLE ... OWNER TO statement that set the ownership of the table > that implicitly created the sequence? It seems reasonable that > changing a table's ownership should also change the ownership of > any implicitly-created sequences, or has that already been discussed > and rejected? > > Thanks. > > -- > Michael Fuhr > http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/ > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
pgsql-bugs by date: