Re: postgresql and smp linux kernel - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | zhicheng wang |
---|---|
Subject | Re: postgresql and smp linux kernel |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20040809131834.24166.qmail@web51007.mail.yahoo.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | postgresql and smp linux kernel (zhicheng wang <wang_zc@yahoo.co.uk>) |
Responses |
Re: postgresql and smp linux kernel
|
List | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the clear answer. What about hyper-threading? At the moment, I have hyper-threading enabled and the OS sees four CPUs (two physical and two virtual). Do these two virtual ones really work as the real ones? I am asking these because we use SAN disks and the secure-path (a fail safe mechanism) only support UP kernel. I have to choose do we run smp or do we make use of secure-path. Regards cheng --- Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote: > zhicheng wang <wang_zc@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Thanks Oliver Elphick > > does this mean that the applications do not need > to be > > multi-threading in order to use multi-processors? > > Yes, that's what it means. Although you've probably > oversimplified it > too much. Multi-process applications make use of > multiple processors > just as well as multi-threaded apps do. > > > --- Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 11:10, zhicheng wang > wrote: > > > > Dear all > > > > > > > > i have a dedicated server mainly running > > > postgresql, > > > > currently rh-posgtresql-7.3.6.7 (and samba, > ypbind > > > > etc). The server is a dual processor machine > and > > > the > > > > OS is RHEL AS 3. > > > > > > > > I am currently running > > > kernel-smp-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL. > > > > > > > > My question is: do i need to run smp kernel > for > > > > postgresql? What is benefit of it? If I run UP > > > kernel, > > > > what do I lose from the point view of PG? > > > > > > You do not NEED it for Pg, but it will improve > > > performance. Each > > > separate session gets a different process and > > > therefore has a change to > > > run on the second processor concurrently with > > > another session on the > > > first processor. The same goes for any other > > > processes that are > > > running, of course. > > > > > > If you do not use an SMP kernel, one of your > > > processors will sit there > > > for ever doing nothing, which is money down the > > > drain. > > > > > > -- > > > Oliver Elphick > > > > olly@lfix.co.uk > > > Isle of Wight > > > http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver > > > GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E > 1EC0 > > > 5664 7A2F A543 10EA > > > > > > ======================================== > > > "Be still before the LORD and wait > patiently > > > for him; > > > do not fret when men succeed in their > ways, > > > when they > > > carry out their wicked schemes." > > > Psalms 37:7 > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > > > > > > > > > > ===== > > Best wishes > > Z C Wang > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW > Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please > send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to > majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list > cleanly > > ===== Best wishes Z C Wang ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
pgsql-general by date: