Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date
Msg-id 200408010043.32944.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
Responses Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> What was the rule for increasing the first number after just before
> 7.0?

That was just to avoid having to release a 6.6.6, which Jan had clearly 
been working towards. :-)

Seriously, major version jumps correspond to epoch-like changes, like 
when the code moved out of Berkeley, or when we switched from bug 
fixing to adding features.  Maybe the next epoch would be after a 
hostile takeover of firebird.  But right now I see no epoch change, 
just a potential for confusing users.  Consistency and humbleness can 
be a virtue.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate