Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date
Msg-id 20040731223447.GA5080@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 12:02:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > We've also never had a single release before that had its version
> > > number jump determined by the number of features.
> >
> > That's a non-argument, Peter; we don't have any clear criteria for
> > version number jump.
> 
> Oh yes, we have very clear criteria: For patch releases, we increase the 
> third number, for feature releases we increase the second number and 
> set the third number to zero.  Clear enough?

What was the rule for increasing the first number after just before 7.0?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Vivir y dejar de vivir son soluciones imaginarias.
La existencia está en otra parte" (Andre Breton)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate